Trust

What Cenelira is, who builds it, and what it does not claim.

Cenelira is a controlled publishing system for social posts. It refuses a post whose destination account is unclear, ties each approval to the exact version the reviewer saw, records every publishing failure with a named cause, and keeps a proof record for every scheduled post, which a PDF export signs. This page lists what ships today, how to reach support, and the claims Cenelira does not make.

Every claim below comes from repository constants or from files named on a linked page. The page shows no customer logos, ratings, testimonials or rankings against competitors.

What it is

A controlled publishing system for social posts

Cenelira schedules posts, checks each destination, ties approval to the exact version, names the cause of every failure and keeps a proof record for every schedule, which a PDF export signs. What it produces is a record you can check, rather than a count of posts sent.

Who it serves

Agencies and brand teams who need a record

It serves agency operators who run publishing across several platforms for clients, and brand teams who need a record of who approved which version for which destination and what happened at publish.

What it avoids

Claims it does not make

Cenelira ships the mechanisms linked from this page. It does not claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA or GDPR certification, it guarantees no audience outcome, and it does not compete on customer logos.

Entity

Three facts the rest of this page rests on

The product name and support contact are constants in src/lib/brand.ts, and the declared scope covers everything the public mechanism pages on this site describe.

Product name

Cenelira

Support contact

[email protected]

Declared scope

Controlled scheduling, approvals, publishing, recovery and proof export, signed as a PDF, across these platforms: Instagram, Facebook, Threads, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, X.

Who this is for

Cenelira is most useful to teams that need a record

Cenelira helps most where an approval of the version someone read must be kept apart from a general yes, and where every failure needs an owner. It helps less when a team wants a high-volume queue and has no need for an audit trail.

For
  • Agency operators running multi-platform publish queues for clients who require an external review link covering every platform in a post, and a proof record for each delivery.
  • Brand teams who need a reviewable record of who approved which version on which destination, and what actually happened at publish.
  • Ops leads who want refusal at publish time when the destination is ambiguous, the grant is expired, or the captured review version no longer matches the current schedule.
  • Solo operators who want the same engine that agencies run, without review, approvals, or assignees.
Not for
  • Teams that want the cheapest possible queue and need no audit trail. Cenelira is priced for the checks and records it keeps, which such a team would not use.
  • Buyers who need a vendor with SOC 2 or ISO 27001 attestations, SAML SSO, audit-log retention SLAs or HIPAA coverage today. Cenelira claims none of these.
  • Teams who treat an external reviewer's identity as a legal signature. On a shared review link that identity is self-declared: the reviewer types their own name and email, and Cenelira does not verify them. On a personal link a client contact is identified only by holding the link.
  • Teams retroactively auditing posts that predate the connection. Wrong-account prevention runs at publish on schedules created in Cenelira.

Proof export

Every mechanism ends in a record you can export

Each mechanism above ends in the same place: a row in the 17-field proof record. The PDF export is signed, the unsigned CSV export is not, and both carry every column. A verifier can recompute the PDF's HMAC-SHA256 signature from its canonical payload, and the signing secret is never written into the file.

The proof export records scheduleId, versionFingerprint, targetAccount, platform, publishAtISO, approverIdentity, approverSource, approvalTimestamp, invalidationReason, publishOutcome, publishedAtISO, platformPostId, exceptionCause, recoveryAction, recoveryActor, deliverySetId, and deliverySetMemberCount.

The proof page explains how to verify a PDF: copy the canonical payload, recompute its SHA-256 digest, then recompute the HMAC-SHA256 with the shared signing secret and compare the result with the printed signature.

The proof export makes no claim about audience, reach or the identity of external reviewers. It records the state of each post's workflow and what the platform answered.

Support

Support is by email, with no promised response time

Support runs by email at [email protected]. Cenelira does not advertise round-the-clock cover, instant response SLAs or dedicated success managers. Requests for a vendor questionnaire, a security pack or a data processing agreement are answered case by case at the same address.

Public limitations

Where each shipped mechanism stops

Each row below is a limit of a mechanism that already runs when a post publishes or when proof is exported.

  • External reviewer identity

    External reviewers approve through a review link. On a shared link their identity is self-declared: they type their own name and email, which Cenelira does not verify. A saved client contact on a personal link is identified only by holding that link. Only internal workspace approvals are tied to a workspace user account.

  • Audience and reach

    Nothing in the proof export, the recovery pages or any public claim on this site describes audience, delivery or reach. The proof record reports what the platform answered and the state of the workflow, and it holds no impression counts.

  • Past-content auditing

    Wrong-account prevention runs at publish time on schedules created in Cenelira. It does not retroactively audit posts that predate the connection.

  • Manual handoff cases

    Every supported platform has an auto-publish path. LinkedIn posts with several images currently go through the manual handoff path, and the handoff pack records who completed the manual publish. This is a current routing choice rather than a permanent platform limit.

  • Procurement controls

    Cenelira makes no public claim today about SAML SSO, SCIM provisioning, audit-log retention SLAs or a choice of data residency for a workspace. Procurement requirements are handled directly by email.

Does not claim

Cenelira does not claim any of the following.

Vendors in this category often use the language below loosely. Cenelira states on this page that it makes none of these claims, so a procurement reviewer does not have to ask.

  • No external compliance certifications

    Cenelira does not claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA or GDPR certification. What ships instead is the set of publish-time refusals, version-bound approvals, owned recovery and proof export named on this page.

  • No audience guarantees

    Cenelira does not promise reach, delivery, engagement or any other audience outcome. A publish either succeeds, with the platform's post id where the platform returns one, is refused for a named reason, or is recorded as a failure with a named cause.

  • No invented social proof

    The site shows no customer logos, testimonials, aggregate ratings or review markup. It describes what is true today.

  • No competitor benchmarks

    Cenelira does not publish ranked comparisons against named competitors. The mechanism pages on this site describe what Cenelira does and name the code behind it.

  • No round-the-clock support claim

    Support runs by email at [email protected]. Cenelira does not advertise round-the-clock cover, instant response SLAs or dedicated success managers.

Unknown / deferred

What this page does not declare yet

A careful reader might expect a trust page to declare each item below. Cenelira has not published values for them, and each row says what is missing and where to ask.

  • Legal entity registration

    The legal entity name, registration jurisdiction and postal address are not published on this site today. Procurement contacts who need them should email [email protected].

  • External profile URLs

    Cenelira does not publish sameAs links to social profiles, press pages, or public registries. The Organization JSON-LD on the trust and home pages carries no sameAs array.

  • Static security and DPA documents

    Vendor questionnaires, security review packs and data processing agreements are handled case by case by email, and none is published as a download on this site.

FAQ

Short answers for evaluators

What is Cenelira in one sentence?

Cenelira is a controlled publishing system for social posts that refuses unclear destinations, ties each approval to the exact version, names the cause of every failure and keeps a proof record for every schedule, which a PDF export signs.

Who builds it?

Cenelira is built by a small team. The legal entity name, registration jurisdiction and postal address are not published on this site today, and procurement questions go directly to [email protected].

How does support work?

Support runs by email at [email protected]. Cenelira does not advertise round-the-clock cover, instant response SLAs or dedicated success managers.

How do I take my data out?

You export the proof archive. Each proof record carries 17 fields, including approval, target account, platform, publish outcome, exception, recovery and delivery-set columns. You can download it as a signed PDF or as an unsigned CSV file, and the proof page explains how to verify the PDF.

Do you hold security or privacy certifications?

Cenelira makes no public claim today of SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA or GDPR attestations. What ships instead is the set of publish-time refusals, version-bound approvals, owned recovery and proof export named on this page.

Which platforms are supported?

Cenelira supports controlled scheduling and publishing on eight platforms, each with an auto-publish path: Instagram, Facebook, Threads, LinkedIn, YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, X. LinkedIn posts with several images currently go through the manual handoff path described on the handoff packs page.

Are external reviewers authenticated?

No. On a shared Cenelira review link, reviewer identity is self-declared, because the reviewer types their own name and email. A saved client contact on a personal link is identified only by holding that link. Internal approvals are tied to workspace user accounts, and the version-bound approval page describes how each decision is bound to the SHA-256 reviewVersion when it is saved.

How does this page stay accurate?

Every claim on this page comes from repository constants or from files named on the linked mechanism pages. The page carries a last-reviewed date, and when a mechanism ships or its scope changes, the facts file, the link and the date are updated.

Last reviewed 2026-04-25

Trust | Cenelira